After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Out of lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the edge to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being found in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to work these devices and to follow their legal right for protection.
It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from opening the channels of safeguard. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post while they assist with expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.
Recent Comments